Qualcomm must license patents to competing chipmakers, court rules


Qualcomm was dealt a important decline in one particular of its numerous ongoing legal battles this afternoon, with a federal courtroom ruling that the company have to license its modem patents to competing chipmakers, potentially weakening its stranglehold on the current market.

The ruling arrived out of a Federal Trade Fee lawsuit in opposition to Qualcomm, which was submitted close to the begin of 2017. The crux of the lawsuit — whether or not Qualcomm utilised anti-competitive tactics to sustain a monopoly around smartphone modems — isn’t becoming ruled on right here. But the court docket did hone in on a single dilemma at concern: whether or not Qualcomm has to license conventional important patents to competition.

In this case, the courtroom ruled it does. Qualcomm agreed to two separate policies that mentioned it would give decide on patents on a non-discriminatory basis. Individuals patents have been crucial to wi-fi criteria — and only recognized into the criteria mainly because of Qualcomm’s agreement to license to absolutely everyone. Just after hunting at the contracts, the court docket stated it was “unambiguous” that Qualcomm was incorrect here. Qualcomm did not instantly answer to a request for comment.

If Qualcomm were allowed to maintain its normal vital patents to by itself, the courtroom wrote, it would enable the organization “to achieve a monopoly in the modem chip market and restrict competing implementations of people elements.” That phrasing may possibly be regarding for Qualcomm, as regardless of whether it utilized anti-competitive techniques to manage a monopoly is at issue in the rest of the lawsuit.

The ruling signifies that Qualcomm has to license patents required for creating a smartphone modem to competing corporations, like Intel. Until eventually now, Qualcomm has only provided those people licenses to providers that straight manufacture smartphones, and it seems that Qualcomm only did that when it was straight providing chips to them.

Which is intended that a business like Intel, which poorly wants to compete with Qualcomm in this sector, has experienced to do the job close to Qualcomm’s patents in purchase to market modems of its individual. And it suggests that a firm like Apple or Samsung, that needs to offer a ton of smartphones, has mostly experienced to rely on Qualcomm’s chips in get to do so.

That’s lousy information for Qualcomm, but excellent information for the relaxation of the marketplace. Should the ruling keep, it could permit extra organizations to make modems or for all those modems to be far more aggressive than they are currently. Intel, for occasion, now tends to make competing modems, but they’ve never been as quickly as Qualcomm’s.

What doesn’t appear to be to be switching, even so, is how significantly Qualcomm can cost for these patents. The FTC has also accused Qualcomm of charging far too-substantial costs for its patents, irrespective of these exact same agreements demanding it to only impose “reasonable” expenses. Apple is suing Qualcomm about the quite similar situation, but courts have nonetheless to rule on this.

Qualcomm faces very similar lawful battles all around the world. Apple is suing it in a number of spots above onerous licensing fees, even though Qualcomm has previously been fined in South Korea, Taiwan, the European Union, and China for issues similar to anti-aggressive licensing tactics.


log in

reset password

Back to
log in